<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Distributed Life &#187; Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mydistributedlife.com/tag/windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mydistributedlife.com</link>
	<description>Musings of a Geek/Husband/Father</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 05:11:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Running a 64-bit Guest Virtual Machine on a 32-bit Host</title>
		<link>http://mydistributedlife.com/2010/03/running-a-64-bit-guest-virtual-machine-on-a-32-bit-host/</link>
		<comments>http://mydistributedlife.com/2010/03/running-a-64-bit-guest-virtual-machine-on-a-32-bit-host/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garett]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mydistributedlife.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently asked by a colleague if it was possible to run a 64-bit guest operating system on a 32-bit host. The question was specifically geared towards running Windows 2008 R2, via VMware Player, on Windows XP. Yes you should definitely be able to run a 64-bit virtual machine on a 32-bit host like ... <span class="more"><a class="more-link" href="http://mydistributedlife.com/2010/03/running-a-64-bit-guest-virtual-machine-on-a-32-bit-host/">[Read more...]</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently asked by a colleague if it was possible to run a 64-bit guest operating system on a 32-bit host. The question was specifically geared towards running Windows 2008 R2, via <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/player/">VMware Player</a>, on Windows XP.</p>
<p>Yes you should definitely be able to run a 64-bit virtual machine on a 32-bit host like Windows XP. There are a couple of caveats, which include:</p>
<ol>
<li>The virtual machine software must support 64-bit guests. That is, VMware Player must support 64-bit guests, which it does. You should use the latest version (3.0 as of this article) to be sure you get support for Windows 2008 R2. See the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/player30/doc/releasenotes_player3.html#new_os">release notes</a> for more information.</li>
<li>The CPU on the machine must support 64-bit instructions. In the case of Intel based CPUs, EMT64.</li>
<li>The CPU must support Virtualization Technology. Again, for Intel CPUs this is the VT extensions.</li>
<li>VT must be enabled. This is often accomplished via the Bios.</li>
</ol>
<p>Those are the perquisites for running 64-bit guests, like Windows 2008 R2, on a 32-bit host. You can check if your CPU supports 64-bit instructions and virtualization technology using <a href="http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php">CPU-Z</a>, or the VMware <a href="http://www.vmware.com/download/shared_utilities.html">shared utilities</a>. VMware also provides additional information in this knowledge base <a href="http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&amp;cmd=displayKC&amp;externalId=1003945">article</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mydistributedlife.com/2010/03/running-a-64-bit-guest-virtual-machine-on-a-32-bit-host/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows XP&#8217;s Performance Surprise</title>
		<link>http://mydistributedlife.com/2009/08/windows-xps-performance-dominance/</link>
		<comments>http://mydistributedlife.com/2009/08/windows-xps-performance-dominance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garett]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mydistributedlife.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is a few months old, but I was very surprised to read some of its findings. It offers a performance comparison of Windows XP versus Vista and Windows 7. I had no idea XP&#8217;s performance lead was that large. As one commenter indicated, I wonder what does this say about Windows 2008. I ... <span class="more"><a class="more-link" href="http://mydistributedlife.com/2009/08/windows-xps-performance-dominance/">[Read more...]</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/platforms/generation-gap-windows-multicore-273?page=0,0&amp;source=rs">article</a> is a few months old, but I was very surprised to read some of its findings. It offers a performance comparison of Windows XP versus Vista and Windows 7. I had no idea XP&#8217;s performance lead was that large. As one commenter indicated, I wonder what does this say about Windows 2008. I suspect it&#8217;s not the same case.</p>
<div style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;" class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/32d936e6-7788-4b61-8fe1-1b553d14a7b1/" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"><img style="border: medium none ; float: right;" class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=32d936e6-7788-4b61-8fe1-1b553d14a7b1" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mydistributedlife.com/2009/08/windows-xps-performance-dominance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
